header-logo header-logo

Law digest: Employment

01 January 2009
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

R v Chargot (trading as Contract Services) [2008] UKHL 73, [2008] All ER (D) 106 (Dec)
 

When criminal proceedings are brought against an employer under ss 2 and 3 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, it is sufficient for the prosecution to prove merely a risk of injury arising from a state of affairs at work (it is not necessary to prove specific breaches of duty by the employer). The onus then passes to the employer to make good the defence of reasonable practicability.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll