header-logo header-logo

Employment

11 March 2010
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Radakovits v Abbey National Plc [2009] EWCA Civ 1346, 010] All ER (D) 16 (Mar)

Authority established that time limits in the context of unfair dismissal claims went to jurisdiction, and that jurisdiction could not be conferred on a tribunal by agreement or waiver. The question of jurisdiction had to be taken by a tribunal if it considered that the issue was a properly live one. It was true that a tribunal could not exercise jurisdiction by concession and equally, in an appropriate case, the tribunal would be obliged to raise the issue of jurisdiction even though it had not been identified by the employers.

Tribunals properly had to guard against exercising a jurisdiction when the statutory conditions were not met. But they were not bloodhounds who had to sniff out potential grounds on which jurisdiction could be refused. If the parties agreed that a particular claimant was an employee, for example, then there would have to be good reason for the tribunal to doubt that that was the case and to require a preliminary hearing to investigate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll