header-logo header-logo

Civil procedure

04 February 2010
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Lombard North Central PLC v Automobile World (UK) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 20, [2010] All ER (D) 166 (Jan)

It was a basic principle of the system of civil procedure that the factual case the parties sought to asset at trial had ordinarily to be set out in their statements of case. That was not a principle based on mere formalism.

It was essential to the conduct of a fair trial that each side should know in advance what case the other was making and thus what case it had to meet and prepare for. It was the function of the pleadings to provide that information. The principle applied as much to litigants in person as to lawyers.

There was no duty on a judge trying a civil claim to check with a litigant in person to inquire as to whether such a litigant in person wished to amend his pleadings to raise any particular issues that he had not pleaded. It was for the litigant to decide what case he wished to make and how to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll