header-logo header-logo

Criminal litigation

12 July 2007
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Ewing v Davis [unreported 2 July 2007]

Historically there has never been a requirement that a private prosecutor has to show a public interest where the prosecution is brought under a public general act. Section 6(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 neither qualifies nor extends existing rights.

Public interest in a private prosecution is established by the nature of the offence as defined in statute, not by the circumstances leading up to it. R (Gladstone Plc) v Manchester City Magistrates’ Court [2004] EWHC 2806 (Admin), [2005] 2 All ER 56 should not be taken as an invitation to magistrates to examine the circumstances of alleged offences and their relation to the private prosecutor.
 

Issue: 7281 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll