header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LAW

06 September 2007
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Hamilton [2007] EWCA Crim 2026, [2007] All ER (D) 99 (Aug)

The defendant admitted to taking video footage with a camera positioned so as to enable him to surreptitiously take footage up the skirts of various women. No-one saw him doing it—and the women were unaware that he was doing it.

He was charged with the common law offence of outraging public decency. It was held that it is necessary to prove two elements:

(i) that the act was of such a lewd character as to outrage public decency;

(ii) that it took place in a public place and must have been capable of being seen by two or more persons who were actually present, even if they had not actually seen it.

Issue: 7287 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll