header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

15 November 2007
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (Morsby) v Tower Bridge Magistrates’ Court [2007] All ER (D) 464 (Oct)

The defendant was remanded in custody and so failed to attend his trial for another offence, of which he was convicted in his absence. He applied under the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, s 142(1) to rescind his conviction and re-open the trial.

HELD the magistrates’ court had placed substantially too much weight on the defendant’s failure to communicate with the court from prison. The interests of justice clearly required the rescission of the claimant’s conviction and a re-trial in his presence.

Issue: 7297 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll