header-logo header-logo

Criminal litigation

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Revitt v DPP [2006] EWHC 2266 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 34 (Sep)

The onus lies on a party seeking to vacate a guilty plea to demonstrate that justice requires that this should be permitted.

If, after an unequivocal plea of guilty, it becomes apparent that the defendant did not appreciate the elements of the offence to which he was pleading guilty, it is likely to be appropriate to permit him to withdraw his plea.

Where the facts relied upon by the prosecution do not add up to the offence charged, justice will normally demand that the defendant be permitted to withdraw his plea.
 

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll