header-logo header-logo

House of Lords

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (Edwards) v Environment Agency [2008] UKHL 22, [2008] All ER (D) 219 (Apr)

When copies of draft speeches which the law lords propose to deliver are provided in confidence, prior to the delivery of judgment, to the legal representatives of the parties to an appeal which has been heard, the purpose is to obtain help in correcting misprints, inadvertent errors of fact or ambiguities of expression. It is not to enable them to reargue the case. Any attempt to do so amounts to an abuse of the procedure of the House of Lords.

Note It is submitted that this principle applies in all courts where draft judgments are handed down in advance.
 

Issue: 7319 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll