header-logo header-logo

Law Digest: 18 January 2008

17 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Profession , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wills

Kostic v Chaplin [2007] EWHC 2909 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 119 (Dec)

 

The costs of a contentious probate action are within the discretion of the court, applying CPR Pts 43 and 44. The general rule (CPR 44.3(2)(a)) is that the unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party. In contentious probate actions, however, two long-established exceptions have survived the introduction of the CPR: (i) if a person who made a will, or people who are interested in the residue, have been the cause of the litigation, a case is made out for the costs to come out of the estate; and (ii) if the circumstances lead, reasonably, to an investigation of the matter, the costs could be left to be borne by those who had incurred them.

Issue: 7304 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Profession , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll