header-logo header-logo

Tort

17 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

M v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2007] EWCA Civ 1361, [2007] All ER (D) 368 (Dec)

 

When taking a decision of whether or not to prosecute, no duty of care is owed to victims, even where the decision took into account the interests of the victims. It would not be reasonable to impose such a duty, since prosecutors must have regard to the wider public interest, as well as the interests of victims (which may not coincide with the public interest or the interests of other victims) and all other relevant circumstances.

Moreover, so far as the police are concerned, the effect of imposing such a duty might be that investigations would be carried out defensively and resources would be diverted from the most important function of the police, that of the suppression of crime.

Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll