header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

26 June 2008
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Prosecution Appeal (No 32 of 2007); R v N Ltd [2008] EWCA Crim 1223, [2008] All ER (D) 112 (Jun)

There is no jurisdiction for a judge to find, before the close of the prosecution case, that there was no case to answer. There is sound reason for the jurisdiction to entertain a submission that there is no case to answer to be exercised at the close of the crown case. It is then that it is known for certain what the evidence actually is. Until then, the most that can be known is what it is expected to be.

 

Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll