header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

26 June 2008
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v G [2008] UKHL 37, [2008] All ER (D) 216 (Jun)

The House of Lords endorsed R v G and another [2002] EWCA Crim 1992, [2003] 3 All ER 206 (per Lord Justice Dyson at 33): “So far as Article 6 is concerned, the fairness of the provisions of the substantive law of the Contracting States is not a matter for investigation.

The content and interpretation of domestic substantive law is not engaged by Article 6.” It follows that a criminal offence of strict liability does not violate Art 6 of the Convention.

Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll