header-logo header-logo

Criminal Evidence

03 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Lynch [2007] All ER (D) 346 (Nov)

This case concerned the admissibility of a statement made by a witness during an identification procedure held pursuant to PACE Code D. 

 

HELD - Section 67 of Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984) does not render admissible something which is hearsay evidence, albeit evidence obtained during a process properly conducted under the Codes of Practice. The Codes of Practice do not alter the rules on admissibility of evidence. Moreover, the Criminal Justice Act 2003, s 114(1)(a) is not authority for the proposition that anything said by a witness in an identification parade is admissible merely because it operated in accordance with Code D.  However, some statements might be so bound up so as to form part of the exception to the hearsay rule; a statement accompanying a relevant act might therefore be admissible. Moreover, the judge was also entitled to conclude that the statement was admissible in the interests of justice pursuant to s 114(1)(d).

Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll