header-logo header-logo

22 September 2020
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Legal News , Equality
printer mail-detail

Law Commission recommends extending protected characteristics

Women should be protected under hate crime laws, the Law Commission has suggested

Currently, the law treats a criminal offence as more serious if the victim is targeted for one of five protected characteristics―race, religion, sexual orientation, disability and transgender identity. The Commission proposes adding sex or gender to the list, primarily to protect women from crimes linked to misogyny.

The extra category would be added as part of an overhaul of hate crime laws, which the Commission says is inconsistent and lacking in clarity.

The Commission is considering including other characteristics, such as age. It also wants to expand the offence of racist chanting at football matches to cover homophobic chanting and behaviour such as gestures and throwing missiles at players.

Professor Penney Lewis, Criminal Law Commissioner, said: ‘Hate crime has no place in our society.’

Dr Loretta Trickett, Associate Professor at Nottingham Law School said: ‘The Law Commission recommendations that sex or gender become a protected characteristic under hate crime law will be welcome by many in the UK.  It means that existing criminal offences such as public order, assaults, harassment and criminal damage can be treated more seriously if targeted against someone on the basis of their sex or gender. 

‘The obvious example is misogyny against women and girls which fuels their harassment and abuse and has for too long limited their use of public and virtual spaces.  Misogyny is a root case of violence against women and girls and is a social problem that requires eradication and the law needs to take a lead on this.  This will now help inform a longer-term educational drive to eliminate misogyny against women and girls enabling them to partake in public life with fear of abuse and harassment simply because of their gender.’

View the consultation, ‘Hate crime’, which ends on 24 December, at: www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/hate-crime.

Issue: 7903 / Categories: Legal News , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll