header-logo header-logo

Late payment scandal

04 September 2014
Issue: 7620 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Law firms have to wait three months to be paid, far longer than most other businesses.

Finance provider LDF said the delay puts firms under financial pressure. It analysed 321 firms and found the average period between a bill being issued and payment received was 94 days.

The average is 41 days in the UK, according to the European payment index. Under the EU late payments directive, businesses can charge interest and recovery costs after 60 days, or 30 days if the client is a public authority.

Peter Alderson, LDF managing director, says: “Waiting more than twice longer than the UK average to be paid for work carried out, and still far in excess of the timeframe that the late payment rules state, is putting many law firms under huge financial strain. For many firms this disruption to cashflow is not easy to absorb, at a time when the financial pressures they are under from increased competition, squeezed margins and the impact of recent regulatory changes such as legal aid cutbacks and changes to no-win, no-fee cases are already intense.”

Issue: 7620 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll