header-logo header-logo

28 January 2026
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Leasehold , Property
printer mail-detail

Land tenure revolution begins

Property lawyers have given a cautious welcome to the government’s landmark Bill capping ground rents at £250, banning new leasehold properties and making it easier for leaseholders to switch to commonhold

The Draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill, laid before Parliament this week, will phase out ground rents over 40 years and replace forfeiture—where leaseholders can lose their home by defaulting on a debt as low as £350—with a fairer debt enforcement system. 

The government estimates about 770,000 to 900,000 leaseholders currently pay more than £250 per year in ground rent.

Housing secretary Steve Reed launched a simultaneous consultation, ‘Moving to commonhold: banning leasehold for new flats’, seeking views on timing, transitional arrangements, exemptions and costs. It ends on 24 April.

Mark Chick, senior partner at Bishop & Sewell and director, Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners (ALEP), said: ‘This Draft Bill represents the most substantial shift in land tenure for more than two centuries.

‘There is clear political and public pressure to accelerate change, but reforms of this magnitude must balance speed with care. Rushed legislation rarely delivers clarity or certainty. Similar comments apply to the proposed cap and eventual sunset on ground rents which will potentially be susceptible to Human Rights Act challenges, although the government has been at pains to set out its approach in a policy statement for this very reason.’

Liam Spender, head of real estate litigation at Velitor Law and campaigner for leaseholder rights, said there may be disappointment that ground rents are not being eliminated immediately but, ‘crucially the cap will make it cheaper for people to buy the freehold and to extend their leases, both of which are priced by reference to ground rent values’.

Anna Favre, partner at Cripps, said the reform would, ‘quite rightly, assist leaseholders enduring the injustice of unusually onerous escalating ground rents.

‘However, it will also retrospectively alter long established contractual income streams relied upon by other landlords and institutional investors. The challenge lies in ensuring that the ground rent cap and wider leasehold reforms are implemented in a way that preserves confidence in UK as a stable investment class while delivering fair outcomes for homeowners.’

Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Leasehold , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll