header-logo header-logo

04 July 2013
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

LALY’s winners revealed

Legal Aid Oscars take place

Civil liberties lawyer Raju Bhatt, of Bhatt Murphy, has been honoured for his work on inquests into deaths in custody at this year’s Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year Awards (LALYs)—the annual Oscars for legal aid folk.

Bhatt was presented with the outstanding achievement award by Lord Justice McFarlane for his commitment to justice. His clients in relation to restraint-related deaths in custody have included the families of Roger Sylvester, Alton Manning, Ibrahima Sey and Shiji Lapite.

In May, Bhatt secured a success in the unsolved case of private investigator Daniel Morgan, who was murdered in a London car park in 1987, when home secretary Theresa May agreed to order a review of the role of police corruption in the case.

Announcing Bhatt’s award, compere John Howard said: “No one should ever underestimate the amount of dogged determination and sheer mettle a case like Morgan takes.”

Also honoured at this week’s 11th annual awards was Margaret Gordon of Christian Khan (criminal defence lawyer of the year), who acted for student Alfie Meadows, acquitted of violent disorder after suffering a serious head injury at an anti-fees protest. Awards were also given to Jane Hoyal of 1 Pump Court (legal aid barrister of the year); Tooks Chambers’ public and immigration barrister Leonie Hirst (newcomer, barrister); and family law solicitor Nadia Salam of GT Stewart (newcomer, lawyer);

Other winners included Colin Mackey of Churchers (family legal aid lawyer of the year); Russell Conway of Oliver Fisher (social and welfare lawyer of the year); Richard Nicholas of RMNJ Solicitors (mental health lawyer of the year); Hackney Law Centre’s Hilton von Herbert (immigration lawyer of the year);and Makin Dixon (legal aid firm/not-for-profit agency).

Issue: 7568 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll