header-logo header-logo

14 December 2016
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Justices hear landmark wills case

Three charities put their case before the Supreme Court this week in the long-running wills case of Ilott v Mitson.

Melita Jackson died in 2004, leaving most of her estate to animal charities and nothing for her estranged daughter, who left home at 17 to live with her boyfriend. Jackson had no connection with the charities during her lifetime. The daughter, Mrs Ilott, who depends on state benefits, made a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. 

Last summer the Court of Appeal held that the daughter should receive one third of the estate (see Ilott v Mitson [2015] EWCA Civ 797). The charities—the Blue Cross, RSPB and RSPCA— appealed.

Richard Kershaw, family law partner at Hunters Solicitors, said: “This is a matter of precedent for the charities but a matter of real need for Mrs Ilott.

“If the Supreme Court upholds the Court of Appeal, it will push the door ajar and encourage many more cases of this kind in future.”

Issue: 7727 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll