header-logo header-logo

20 May 2022
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Justice inspectorates sound warning

The four HM Chief Inspectors of police, Criminal Prosecution Service, probation and prison services have issued a devastating warning on the ‘knock-on effect’ of the courts backlog

In a foreword to their joint report, published this week, ‘The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the criminal justice system’, the chief inspectors said the justice system ‘continues to operate at unacceptable levels’. They said the average a case has been outstanding by the time a Crown Court trial begins is 282 days, which ‘has a damaging impact on justice itself’.

‘The burden on police, the CPS and court staff of the live caseloads and backlogs in the courts is immense. Ensuring, over extended periods, that cases are and stay ready for trial, that serious or complex cases and custody cases are prioritised, and that victims and witnesses are kept on board is very challenging.’

In non-London areas, the ‘availability of external advocates is a real issue… the pandemic resulted in barristers leaving the self-employed Bar and even as things return to normal, many have not returned’, the report said.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘It is particularly compelling to see the four HM Chief Inspectors—who have no vested interest when it comes to defence practitioners—echoing our concerns about the urgent need for investment in defence practice if there is to be any prospect of clearing the court backlogs.

‘Sustained investment is needed across the criminal justice system and, as the report points out, the plan must be coordinated for the system to recover.’

Official figures for March show a drop in the backlog of 500 cases to 57,838 outstanding cases in the Crown Court.

Professor Chris Bones, chair of CILEX, said: ‘Allowing prosecutors who trained via the CILEX route to become Crown Prosecutors would help alleviate these pressures.’

View the full report here.
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll