header-logo header-logo

Just rewards

14 September 2012 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason provide a wills & probate update

In the recently decided case of Re JC [2012] WTLR 1211, JC had four children:

  • A, with A’s mother who was 15 when she gave birth. A was subsequently put into a children’s home and then fostered. JC denied being A’s biological father but a paternity test confirmed otherwise.
  • B and C were born following JC’s marriage to Mrs C. They divorced due to JC’s violence and aggression to all members of the family.
  • D was born almost a year after JC and Mrs C divorced (the consequence of JC raping Mrs C). D was given up for adoption as Mrs C was living in considerable poverty.

Neither B nor C had contact with JC for decades, but had been in contact in the later stages of his life. A was in contact with JC throughout his life despite JC denying paternity. D had made contact with her mother and B and C, but had never met JC (he again denied paternity).

In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll