header-logo header-logo

Judicial review—Availability of remedy—Upper Tribunal

30 June 2011
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Eba v Advocate General for Scotland [2011] UKSC 29, [2011] All ER (D) 150 (Jun)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Hope DP, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Clarke and Lord Dyson, 22 Jun 2011

Scottish law is the same as English with regard to judicial review of a refusal by the Upper Tribunal of permission to appeal to itself.

Jonathan Mitchell QC and Lorna Drummond (instructed by Quinn Martin and Langan) for the petitioner. David Johnston QC and Simon Collins (instructed by the Office of the Solicitor to the Advocate General for Scotland) for the advocate general. Michael Fordham QC and Tim Buley (instructed by Herbert Smith LLP) for the Public Law Project as intervener. Alex Bailin QC, Aidan O’Neill QC and Iain Steele (instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP) for Justice as intervener. James Mure QC and Anna Poole (instructed by the Scottish Government Legal Directorate) for the Lord Advocate as intervener.

The proceedings raised an issue common to that of the two cases before

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll