header-logo header-logo

Judicial line: 11 April 2019

11 April 2019
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

This week: unlock the interlock—fast; who posts the claim form; costs only interim cash; divorce costs assessments

Final judgment wins

Q Can an interlocutory order be set aside on application after a final judgment which of itself may not be attackable where a set aside would render the final judgment unsustainable?

A No. An application which had this effect would be an abuse of the court’s process as a collateral attack on a final judgment (see, eg, Daniel Terry v BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2422). If an interlocutory order was made without a hearing and close to trial with a CPR 23.10 right to an affected party to apply to set aside or vary within seven days (although such orders are being increasingly made allowing up to six weeks to apply) then it might be that the trial could not proceed until the application had been determined.

‘They’re at the postbox right now’

Q Is it acceptable for the certificate of service of a claim form which has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll