header-logo header-logo

12 August 2020
Issue: 7899 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Pensions
printer mail-detail

Judges receive their pensions

Ministers have given an update on progress on pension benefits for judges following the O’Brien No 2 and Miller cases

Hundreds of fee-paid judges were found to have missed out on pensions in the 2018 European Court of Justice ruling (O’Brien No 2) that part-time judges should receive the same benefits as full-time judges, pro rata, and the 2019 Supreme Court judgment (Miller) that judges whose careers included stints of full-time and part-time work should have equal pensions treatment.

About 1,800 judges, of whom 800 have retired, were due more benefits after O’Brien No 2.

As of 29 July, the MoJ confirmed this week in a statement, 964 service records have been agreed with retired and non-retired O’Brien No 2 claimants, service records have been agreed for 606 of the retired judges and interim payments are being made to 510 of those 606.

On Miller claims, the MoJ made some interim payments in July and will begin monthly payments this month. See the full statement at: bit.ly/3fO2I6P.

Issue: 7899 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll