header-logo header-logo

26 June 2015
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judges get digital

Sir Brian Leveson, the President of the Queen’s Division, has called for more sophisticated technology to be installed in the courts.

In a speech to the Modernising Justice 2015 conference, in London this week, Sir Brian said technology was “essential” to any attempt to run the criminal justice system for less.

“The amount of paper we now have to wrestle with is almost unmanageable and, on top of that, the amount of electronic material which emanates from e mails and a myriad of other sources is unimaginably huge,” he said. 

In May 2014, the Lord Chancellor announced a £700m package to improve court and tribunal administration. A programme to introduce digital case files in the Southwark and Leeds Crown Court and in civil cases in the Rolls Building, will complete in October.

The judiciary are switching from the Government Secure Internet to Windows 365 and a service called eJudiciary, while wifi is being installed in criminal courts, with civil and family courts soon to follow suit, he said.

While history was littered with expensive government IT failures, and while some judges may prefer to work with paper, the new, more digitally-oriented justice system was a “once-in-a-generation opportunity”, he said.

“We simply cannot carry on cost cutting, salami slicing our approach, trying to do the same thing for less money and it will be far better as a result.”

 

Issue: 7659 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll