header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Joy over tax ruling may be short-lived

News

The House of Lords’ landmark ruling in the Arctic Systems tax case may turn out to be a pyrrhic victory for family businesses after the government announced plans to change the law.

In Jones v Garnett (Inspector of Taxes) the law lords rejected an appeal by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) to impose tax on a husband- and wife-run IT consultancy retrospectively under the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988, s 660A. They ruled that Geoff and Diana Jones would not be taxed for dividends that Mr Jones paid to his wife.

HMRC claimed the pair had avoided tax on earnings by paying themselves a small salary (£7,000 for him and £4,000 for her) from Arctic Systems’ 2000–01 turnover of nearly £100,000. The amount was then split equally, less tax and expenses, in dividends.

In a ministerial statement issued this week, the government says it wants to clamp down on the tax-saving arrangement used by thousands of husband and wife businesses. However, Francesca Lagerberg of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales Tax Faculty says: “There is a danger that rushed legislation will result in unworkable legislation, plunging thousands of taxpayers into yet more uncertainty about their tax position.”

Issue: 7284 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll