header-logo header-logo

12 May 2016
Issue: 7699 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Jones result: CFAs can be assigned

​Court rules that assignment of CFAs does not breach the indemnity principle

A conditional fee agreement (CFA) can be assigned, a court has held, in a decision that will affect thousands of cases.

Ruling in the county court at Liverpool in Jones v Spire Healthcare (App No 96/2015) last week, Judge Graham Wood QC held that an insolvent firm of solicitors can validly assign its entitlement and responsibility under a CFA with a client to another firm of solicitors.

If they were not able to do so, Judge Wood said, then potentially recoverable costs would be “lost forever…to the disadvantage of any creditor in the administration, and to the advantage of an opposing party who might escape a substantial liability for costs in the event of losing the case”.

The case arose after well-known Midlands law firm Barnetts went into administration in 2013, and its CFA personal injury cases were bought by SGI Legal. A deed of assignment was drafted by specialist counsel. The claimant in Jones signed a separate deed of assignment and eventually settled her case for £17,500. Last year, a county court judge ruled that personal contracts could not be assigned under common law.

Hannah Riordan, associate at law firm Clarion, says: “Sitting at the County Court at Liverpool, HHJ Wood ruled that DJ Jenkinson was wrong to construe the ‘Jenkins exception’ to the rule against CFA assignment, so narrowly as to only apply where a client loyally follows an individual fee earner from one firm to another.

“Given that most modern day case handling is conducted at a distance, such circumstances would often be too difficult to prove. This judgment means that assignment of CFAs does not breach the indemnity principle, and will result in a valid retainer, allowing recovery of both pre-and post-assignment costs.”

NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan, of City University, says: “In a decision affecting thousands of cases where costs run into the millions, it has been held that one can lawfully assign a CFA.

“The practical upshot is that a newly appointed solicitor can take the benefit of the original agreement. Thus, costs and a recoverable success fee will accrue.”

Issue: 7699 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll