header-logo header-logo

26 September 2013
Issue: 7577 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

January sales prediction

PI department sellers will face a “buyer’s market” after Xmas

Law firms considering selling off their personal injury departments have until the end of the year before market conditions change, SGI Legal has warned.

According to SGI’s managing partner, Simon Gibson, the more lucrative work that dates from before the implementation of the legal aid cuts and Jackson reforms to civil litigation in April is “constantly diminishing”.

Gibson says: “Firms that are considering a business or work in progress (WIP) sale but have delayed a decision are losing money every day. 

“While it is currently a seller’s market, I expect this will change in the New Year as the number of sellers increases and the number of credible buyers—that is, firms with the cash resources in place and the support of their indemnity insurers—falls. This will mean that potential acquirers will be justified in driving a harder bargain.

“Those in for the long haul need to focus on making the right investments to retain business sustainability while those looking to leave need to urgently formulate their exit strategy.”

Four-partner personal injury firm SGI recently acquired midlands firm Challinors’ personal injury book.

Other acquisitions in the personal injury market include stock exchange-listed Quindell Portfolio’s purchase of The Compensation Lawyers, Silverbeck Rymer and Pinto Potts last year. Slater & Gordon, which bought Russell Jones & Walker last year, bought the personal injury practice of Taylor Vinters last month, and announced talks with Goodmans Law in May. 

Gibson says: “Some firms may decide to run down their WIP over the next two years—but not only is it a pretty demoralising approach, it may not be profitable when you take into account the costs of winding down, such as run-off insurance cover, tax and redundancy costs.”

 

Issue: 7577 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll