header-logo header-logo

Jackson talks fixed costs

16 February 2017
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lord Justice Jackson has vowed to keep an open mind about what types and levels of cases should fall within proposals to extend fixed recoverable costs.

Sir Rupert, who is hosting a series of fact-finding seminars across the country, has said that his remit is to extend fixed costs to those cases in the fast track that are not currently subject to fixed costs and to cases on the multi-track which can properly be the subject of fixed costs.

Speaking in Manchester last week, Sir Rupert emphasised that he would be looking at costs and procedures, and floated the notion of an “intermediate” track between the fast and multi-track to which fixed costs would apply (potentially with appropriate ring-fencing) and “full” multi track claims, which would proceed by way of budgeting.

Future seminars are scheduled for Cardiff, Birmingham and London.

Issue: 7734 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll