header-logo header-logo

03 August 2017
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Jackson’s capped costs pilots will ‘bring access to justice’

Lord Justice Jackson’s capped costs pilot will bring ‘greater access to justice’, the president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) has said.

The opt-in pilot, proposed this week in Jackson LJ’s Review of Civil Litigation Costs, will apply to business and property disputes worth up to £250,000. It will run for two years in London Mercantile Court and the Mercantile, TCC and Chancery courts in Manchester and Leeds.

The pilot aims to streamline court procedure, lower costs, increase the certainty of costs exposure and speed up resolution of claims. Jackson LJ said the parties would be able to rely on documents contained in the bundle, with no disclosure ordered as a general rule.

Ed Crosse, LSLA president and disputes partner at Simmons & Simmons, said: ‘The capped costs pilot will involve the adoption of established and widely endorsed fast track procedures, which, with robust case management, should provide greater procedural efficiency and certainty to the litigation process.

‘This should, in turn, reduce the work (and associated legal costs) that currently has to be incurred by parties under the existing Civil Procedure Rules. For example, under this voluntary pilot, the presumption that a party will be entitled to wide ranging disclosure, extensive evidence and a lengthy trial is reversed. Instead, parties opting into the scheme can expect to have their cases heard within just eight months of the first case management conference, with limited disclosure and evidence, and with a trial lasting no more than two days.’

Crosse said the LSLA believes the scheme should remain voluntary beyond the duration of the pilot.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll