header-logo header-logo

Jackson delayed to 2013

02 February 2012
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Update on timetable for Legal Aid, Sentencing & Punishment of Offenders Bill

Lord Wallace, the Advocate General for Scotland, has confirmed that, subject to Parliamentary approval, the implementation of the Jackson reforms will be postponed until April 2013. They were originally due to come into effect in October this year.

In a statement in the House of Lords on the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill this week, Lord Wallace said: “These proposals will require the making of new regulations and changes to the Civil Procedure Rules.

“We wish to make sure that we get the details of these regulations and rules right, and that will inevitably take some time. We are also conscious that stakeholders will need appropriate notice of when the changes will be implemented and how the details will affect them.”

The Jackson reforms would impose a 25% cap on uplift fees, add an extra 10% onto damages, and put an end to lawyers being able to recover success fees and after-the-event premiums from losing defendants.

The legal aid provisions of the Bill have already been postponed to April 2013.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “We are committed to reforming the ‘no-win, no-fee’ system so that legal costs for reasonable compensation claims will be more proportionate, and avoidable claims will be deterred from going to court.

“This will help us to move away from the current unacceptable situation where, for example, the NHS paid £200m to claimants’ lawyers for compensation cases in 2010-11—around three times more than it paid its own lawyers.

“This will require changes to legal rules and regulations and we want to give sufficient time to get the complex details right. We are also conscious that legal businesses will need sufficient time to plan for the changes, alongside other forthcoming regulatory and funding changes to the industry.” 

The delay has been welcomed by legal commentators. NLJ columnist, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School, says: "The postponement is welcome. It is essential, given the enormity of the reforms, that measures are thoroughly prepared. The current Part 36 mess is due to implementation with undue haste in 2007."

Issue: 7499 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll