header-logo header-logo

13 September 2007
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

JAC not to blame for judge shortages

News

The head of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) has hit back at claims that her organisation is to blame for the severe shortage of circuit judges and delays in trials.

Baroness Prashar told The Times that the JAC put forward a shortlist of 102 names to be circuit judges, including 47 recommendations for immediate vacancies in April, but only one had been appointed so far: “So if there is any delay, it is not with us.”

“Our job is to meet the business requirements that we are given and we have done that. It is not our job to call people off the list—that is the job of the department and the judiciary,” she says.

Lord Phillips, the lord chief justice, recently expressed concern about the delays in the appointment of judges, while president of the Family Division of the High Court, Sir Mark Potter, called the vacancies “inexcusable”.
Lady Prashar said the JAC’s new selection process, which was born through the new statutory framework set out in the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, was itself constrained by procedures. “Judges may grumble but equally they will grumble if they are not given time to write their references,” she says.

She adds: “I think it is important that people understand what is actually happening. Carping criticism of a new body does not help. It is not in the public interest because the credibility of the commission matters and ultimately its credibility will depend on the people we appoint.”

Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll