header-logo header-logo

03 July 2015 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Human rights
printer mail-detail

It’ll all end in tiers

nlj_7659_pigott

Charles Pigott explains how Christian bakers came unstuck over a “gay cake”

The facts in Lee v Ashers Baking Co Ltd and others [2015] NICty 2 took place just after the Northern Ireland Assembly had voted for the third time against same sex marriage in April 2014.

Gareth Lee had asked Ashers—a substantial bakery company run by a Christian couple Colin and Karen McArthur—to bake a cake to his own design. This was a service widely advertised by the company. His design incorporated a coloured picture of the Sesame Street puppets Bert and Ernie, the logo of QueerSpace (a charity promoting LGBT rights) and the headline caption “Support Gay Marriage”. Although his order was at first accepted when he came into the shop, it was subsequently declined and his money refunded. Mrs McArthur said in evidence that the problem was the message on the cake, because as a Christian she did not support gay marriage.

The judge found that Mr and Mrs McArthur knew that Mr Lee was gay or associated with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll