header-logo header-logo

27 November 2015
Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Irwin Mitchell & Thomas Eggar to tie the knot

Irwin Mitchell and Thomas Eggar are to merge to create a £250m law firm and are planning further expansion in London and the south east of England.

The merger will be Irwin Mitchell’s eighth merger with, or acquisition of, a law firm since 2012 and pushes it into 11th place in UK law firm rankings.

All 450 Thomas Eggar employees, including 67 partners, will transfer to Irwin Mitchell after a TUPE process beginning this week. Thomas Eggar will adopt the Irwin Mitchell brand in the first half of 2016 at its six offices in London and the south-east. Irwin Mitchell has 11 offices plus Berkeley Law in London’s Mayfair.

The firms said the combined strength of the private wealth teams from Irwin Mitchell, Thomas Eggar and Berkeley Law (acquired by Irwin Mitchell last November) would create a top-five private client offering, with plans for significant growth.

Thomas Eggar managing partner Vicky Brackett, who will sit on the Irwin Mitchell Group executive board, says: “Clients tell us that what they value most are long-lasting relationships with innovative firms that can work with them side by side providing trustworthy advice.

“Our people, their expertise and ability to forge long-term relationships with clients are our greatest asset and this merger provides us with a terrific opportunity to offer clients across the country a wider range of services.”

Irwin Mitchell Group chief executive Andrew Tucker says:  “A merger with one of the leading business and private client law firms in the south east will transform our group.

“It combines the strengths of two highly-respected businesses to create a dynamic, client-focused firm that will give us further scale, critical mass and a competitive advantage in our target markets to become the legal brand of choice.”

The merger is expected to complete in December 2015.

Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll