header-logo header-logo

05 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Features , Conveyancing , Compliance , Technology
printer mail-detail

*Partner copy* Introducing the new Client and Matter Risk Assessment within eCOS

237730
David Rawson, eCOS Head of Product, InfoTrack UK

Today, firms are under more pressure than ever, not just to show compliance by asking the right questions when assessing the risk of a new instruction, but also to clearly document how they have reached their decisions. The SRA’s guidance makes it clear that a complete risk assessment is not simply about running checks; it is about demonstrating the reasoning that supports your conclusions.

This is where I believe technology has a real role to play in making the entire process simpler, easier, and faster. Compliance should not feel like an added burden or a process that sits outside your everyday work. It should happen naturally as part of how you onboard clients and manage matters.

That thinking has guided the development of our new Client Matter Risk Assessment (CMRA) feature within eCOS. CMRA allows firms to review the results of our ID, AML, and Verification of Funds checks, assess client and matter risk, capture those decisions, and record their reasoning, all within the same workflow. Every step is stored alongside the supporting data and reports, creating a clear, auditable record of compliance as you go.

CMRA provides an integrated framework that keeps firms compliant throughout the onboarding process. It ensures that the work you are already doing to verify clients and complete AML checks directly informs your risk assessment, without extra admin or rekeying.

You can now add a CMRA to any eCOS Workspace from within the eCOS Matter Viewer. CMRA is included free with all eCOS orders. We are currently rolling it out to early adopters, and I am already hearing from firms who value having their compliance process fully connected inside eCOS.

By embedding risk assessment within onboarding, firms gain three key advantages:

  1. A consistent and documented compliance framework.
  2. Less duplication of effort and fewer systems to manage.
  3. Better visibility of client and matter risk across the business

This first release is just the start. We are already working on enhancements that will allow firms to configure their own templates and automate parts of the assessment using data already held in eCOS and across the wider InfoTrack UK platform. These improvements will give firms even greater flexibility while maintaining a clear, auditable compliance process.

At InfoTrack, our mission has always been to make compliance an integral part of how firms work, not an afterthought. CMRA takes that a step further by keeping firms compliant as they go, supporting better decision-making, and helping ensure every client and matter meets regulatory expectations.

If your firm would like early access, please reach out to your InfoTrack Account Manager or contact our team directly. I am looking forward to seeing how firms use CMRA to strengthen their compliance from the very start of the onboarding journey.

For more information, speak to our team today:


About InfoTrack:

 

At InfoTrack, we believe legal professionals deserve solutions that reflect the importance of their work, the trust they uphold, and the value of their time. Our purpose is to empower law firms to thrive in the digital era. Since launching 10 years ago, we’ve grown to support over half the industry, with 25,000 professionals relying on us every day to manage their workload. Our smart, secure, and deeply integrated platform simplifies key tasks from client onboarding to post completion, all within a single sophisticated platform. In 2024, InfoTrack received the King’s Award for Enterprise in Innovation for modernising conveyancing through technology. www.infotrack.co.uk 020 7186 8090

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll