header-logo header-logo

31 July 2008
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Internet service providers warned over data protection

Legal news

Internet service providers should be aware of the data protection rights of individuals in their fight against illegal online data sharing, say experts.

Last week UK record labels association, the BPI, reached an agreement with Internet service providers (ISPs) and the government on measures to reduce illegal filesharing. The memorandum of understanding (MOU) places commitments on the recording industry and ISPs to develop consumer education programmes and legal online services allowing users to download legal content for free. In addition, “informative letters” are to be sent to users, identified by the BPI, whose accounts are suspected as being used illegally.

Penelope Thornton, associate in intellectual property, media and technology at Lovells, says the parties to the MOU will need to be careful about the operation of the Data Protection Act 1998 in any action taken against filesharers. “In some cases infringement of copyright by peer-to-peer file sharing can amount to a criminal offence, but personal data which relates to alleged criminal activity is ‘sensitive’ personal data under the Act and can normally be processed only with the explicit consent of the individual unless an appropriate exemption applies,” she says.

The MOU announcement was followed swiftly by the launch of a consultation from the Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. The consultation includes proposals for legislative measures to address illicit filesharing, including granting personal data relating to IP addresses to rights holders on request.

Thornton continues, “In the hands of BPI the IP addresses may well not amount to personal data, but it is likely to be different in the case of the ISPs since they can match the address to a known individual.”

While no specific action was detailed for those that ignore the letters, the introduction of the MOU is seen as a response to government threats to legislate. Earlier this year the government suggested it was planning legislation to make it mandatory for ISPs to take action against those guilty of illegal sharing files. Thornton says the government prefers an industry led approach to the issue and that it has denied it will follow the proposed “graduated response” as in France. It may, however, seek alternative, technology based solutions. “Proposed technical measures to be discussed by ISPs, rights holders and Ofcom, such as filtering and marking content to help identify legitimate content, could be effective solutions. However they have been the subject of bitter negotiations between the ISPs and the rights owners for some time, without any resolution,” she says.

Issue: 7332 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll