header-logo header-logo

International arbitration: widening the circle

02 July 2021 / Masood Ahmed
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail
52132
Masood Ahmed provides guidance on taking evidence from non-parties in international arbitration
  • A Court of Appeal decision has provided authority on the application of s 44(2)(a) of the Arbitration Act 1996, which provides the court with the power to order the taking of evidence from a non-party to an arbitration.

Section 44(2)(a) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) provides the court with the power to order the taking of evidence from a non-party to an arbitration so that it can be adduced in an arbitration that is being conducted in a foreign jurisdiction. As well as s 44(2)(a), the other powers of the court under s 44(2) include the preservation of evidence; orders in respect of property which is subject to the proceedings; the sale of goods that are subject to the proceedings; and the granting of interim injunctions and appointing receivers. In the case of A and another v C and others [2020] EWCA Civ 409, [2020] All ER (D) 135 (Mar), the Court of Appeal provided

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll