header-logo header-logo

25 July 2019 / Barry Fletcher
Issue: 7850 / Categories: Features , Arbitration , Commercial , Profession
printer mail-detail

International arbitration: a post-LIDW reflection

What are the current challenges for international commercial arbitration in London & beyond? Barry Fletcher reflects on some of the issues

Energetic discussion regarding the current state and future of international commercial arbitration was at the heart of this May’s inaugural London International Disputes Week (LIDW). Drawing on some of the event’s key themes, I have set out to demonstrate that while London arbitration faces some particular challenges to its continued success, the most significant issues facing this form of dispute resolution are not exclusive to London or, indeed, any single seat of arbitration.

What can data tell us?

First, let’s consider one barometer of health: arbitration caseload statistics. As my colleague James Clanchy examined in a recent article (‘Arbitration statistics 2018: London bucks downward trends’, LexisNexis DR Blog, 20 June 2019), an analysis of 2018 statistics from six major international arbitral bodies—the HKIAC, the ICC, the LCIA, the LMAA (not an arbitral institution but an association of arbitrators who conduct arbitrations under its ad hoc procedure rules),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll