header-logo header-logo

19 June 2008
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Intenational cartel action

Legal news

The jailing of three UK businessmen for bid-rigging signals a new era of international cooperation to prosecute operators of cartels —but does not reduce the risk of US extradition, lawyers say.

The businessmen, arrested in the US but allowed to return to the UK as part of a plea agreement, were convicted of dishonestly participating in a cartel for the supply of marine hose and ancillary equipment in the UK and sentenced to between twoand- a-half to three years’ imprisonment following an investigation by the Office of Fair Trading.

Peter Kiernan, head of international investigations at Crowell & Moring and former SFO deputy director, says the US and UK authorities are now willing to act in concert to achieve the “optimal” conclusion in each case.

“The message is clear, law enforcement agencies on both sides of the Atlantic will co-operate to find the optimal solution for them, which means the worst possible solution for those in the firing line.”

An investigation into the companies involved in the cartel is currently being undertaken by the European Commission.

Kiernan says: “The EU investigation shows that a two-pronged approach with parallel or sequential criminal and civil proceedings can deliver the optimal spread of action against individuals and companies.

Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll