header-logo header-logo

Insurance surgery: A new regime

23 October 2014 / James Deacon
Categories: Features , Insurance surgery
printer mail-detail

The Insurance Bill may alter centuries old law on disclosure by commercial policyholders, warranties & remedies for fraud & place more emphasis on active underwriting, says James Deacon

Changes brought about by the new Insurance Bill, which had its second reading in the House of Lords on 30 July 2014, will, if enacted, result in a major upgrade to insurance contract law, with far-reaching implications for insurers. 

The most notable changes introduced by the Bill relate to disclosure by commercial policyholders, warranties and fraudulent claims. 

Duty of disclosure

Under the Bill, the duty of disclosure is retained for businesses, placing it within a wider “duty of fair presentation” of the risk. Policyholders will comply with their duty by ensuring that all material circumstances are disclosed or sufficient information is provided to put insurers on notice to make further enquiries. 

In recent years, underwriters have been swamped by electronic information on the risk from insureds in the expectation that “material circumstances” would be discovered somewhere among it. The Law Commission has made

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll