header-logo header-logo

Insurance surgery: Giving the green light?

16 September 2014 / David Bott
Categories: Features , Insurance surgery
printer mail-detail

Does the decision in Gavin Edmondson Solicitors v Haven Insurance allow insurers to take client data from the RTA portal, asks David Bott

A recent case has stirred up significant concerns across the personal injury industry. The case deals with insurers approaching clients to settle directly, having obtained their information from the road traffic accident (RTA) portal, in turn by-passing the claimant’s solicitors entirely. So what are the implications of this recent judgment for PI solicitors? Has this case given the green light to insurers to take client data from the portal?

The case 

Last month, His Honour Judge Milwyn Jarman QC handed down judgment in the case of Gavin Edmondson Solicitors v Haven Insurance (13 August 2014, unreported), finding in favour of the defendant insurance company. 

In this case the insurers, Haven, contacted claimants directly using information submitted to the RTA portal. This was despite the claimants having already instructed solicitors who had entered their details onto the centralised system. As a result of Haven’s approach, the claimants accepted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll