header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015
Issue: 7641 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Insurance Bill now law

The Insurance Act 2015 has passed into law, giving effect to wide-ranging reform recommended by the Law Commission.

Under the Act, insurers will no longer be able to refuse the whole of a claim because of one transgression, as a new scheme of proportionate remedies replaces the existing single remedy of avoidance. The Act also includes a new “duty of fair presentation”, clarifying the information that business policyholders have a legal duty to volunteer.

Insurers will be liable to pay any claim that arises after a breach of warranty has been remedied, for example, where a broken burglar alarm is repaired before the claim arises, and can no longer escape liability on the basis of a breach of contract terms by the policyholder where the breach is irrelevant to the loss suffered. “Basis of the contract” clauses, which can turn any statement from a policyholder into a warranty, will be abolished.

Where a policyholder makes a fraudulent claim, however, the Act aims to provide insurers with a clear remedy, and they can refuse the whole claim if any part of it is fraudulent. 

The Act is due to come into force in August 2016.

The Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission made the recommendations in their 2014 report, Insurance Contract Law: Business Disclosure, Warranties, Insurers’ Remedies for Fraudulent Claims, and Late Payment.

Stephen Lewis, Law Commissioner, says: “We are delighted the government has implemented the majority of our recommendations in the Insurance Bill. 
“The provisions of the Act will modernise the law.”

Professor Hector MacQueen, Scottish Law Commissioner leading on the project for Scotland, says: “The existing law that governs business insurance contracts is weighted in favour of insurers, giving them wide-ranging powers to refuse claims. 

“We look forward to the Act coming into force and delivering for the UK a legal framework fit to support our world-leading insurance industry.”

 

Issue: 7641 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll