header-logo header-logo

Insurance

24 February 2011
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Re Sompo Japan Insurance Inc [2011] EWHC 260 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 185 (Feb)

In considering whether to exercise its discretion by sanctioning an insurance business transfer scheme, ultimately what the court was concerned with was whether the scheme was fair as between different classes of affected persons, and in arriving at a conclusion as to whether or not it was, among the most important material before the court was material which the Act required to be before it, namely the report of an independent actuary as to his opinion on the scheme.

Further, the court had recognised that a reduction in the security level of transferred policies was not automatically and in every case unfair to the transferring policyholders, either viewed separately, or in the context of the realisation of some commercial objective of the proponents. The strict regulation of the conduct of insurance business in the UK, supervised by the FSA, required specified levels of security to be maintained by insurers but, provided that those levels were not adversely impacted, an insurer was in principle at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll