header-logo header-logo

Insolvency

30 June 2011
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re Derfshaw Ltd and others [2011] EWHC 1565 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 144 (Jun)

The court was concerned with whether it had jurisdiction to make an administration order retrospectively, and if so, whether it should exercise that jurisdiction to make such an order. Consideration was given to G-Tech Construction Ltd [2007] BPIR 1275 (G-Tech) in which the judge had taken the view, inter alia, that the court did have power pursuant to para 13 of Sch B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 to make a retrospective order, and to declare that the earlier actions of the persons who were purportedly administrators at the earlier time should be ratified as valid in all respects. In allowing the application, the court held that the lead of G-Tech would be followed. 
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll