header-logo header-logo

28 May 2021
Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail

InfoTrack rolls out upgraded digital conveyancing solution Property Report

Legal tech company InfoTrack has launched a number of enhancements to its digital conveyancing solution Property Report
Property Report is a tool allowing users to create a standardised title report in as little as 15 minutes, providing content tailored to title registers, conveyancing searches and stamp duty land tax (SDLT) in line with government guidance. Selecting applicable tenure types (including freehold, leasehold, new build, shared ownership, and underlease) allows the report to automatically insert or remove components based on relevancy, and extracting data directly from complementary title registers removes the need to copy and paste covenants, easements or rentcharges. Property Report also assesses the risk ratings of data from integrated environmental searches, and uses automation to report on SDLT.


Adrian Noble, managing director at Key Legal, commented: ‘It is clear that the system has been designed with the conveyancer in mind and is a significant time-saving tool. I have been completely sold on the benefits of Property Report. The report can be entirely amended as required and is updated in real time so that you can actually see how your amendments will appear within the report.’

Scott Bozinis, chief executive officer at InfoTrack, added: ‘Using Property Report provides transparent communication channels with your client, including disclaimers to mitigate risk for your firm and keep the buyer fully informed. InfoTrack’s automation allows conveyancers to apply their expertise and review SDLT information before purchaser-approval. Reporting on SDLT and Environmental Search data is no longer a time-consuming and complex task.’

Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll