header-logo header-logo

Indian legal market liberalisation: one step forward, one step back

01 July 2018 / Dapinder Singh KC
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
856615090

With the Indian Supreme Court reserving judgment on the liberalisation of the Indian legal sector, Dapinder Singh QC examines the latest developments in this potentially huge market

  • The UK legal sector awaits a hugely significant decision on the potential liberalisation of the Indian market.
  • If liberalisation is allowed, major UK firms are well placed to push further into the market.
  • Can liberalisation be the catalyst for Indian firms’ growth and influence abroad?

It was in mid-March that the Supreme Court of India ruled on whether to open up the Indian legal market to overseas firms. It decided not to decide. At least not fully. So we have another pause in the decades-long to-ing and fro-ing on the matter.

The current status sees a small concession in that foreign lawyers may now formally visit India on a ‘fly in/fly out’ basis and may offer clients advice on foreign laws. However, it remains that foreign firms cannot set up Indian offices without changes to the Indian

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll