header-logo header-logo

Income drop for barristers

25 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Average takings drop 12% as profession feels pain of cuts

Barristers’ average income has fallen 12% in the last two years—from £123,000 to £108,000.

The figures, gathered by finance provider LDF, mean many may struggle to meet their 31 July bill deadline. The July bill is a payment on account for self-employed persons, usually equal to half of the previous year’s tax bill.

The average income may seem very generous indeed to many barristers. Junior criminal counsel, in particular, have been hard hit by cuts to legal aid fees. A 30% reduction in fees for Very High Cost Cases has led to a boycott by criminal barristers, which resulted in the high-profile stay of a multi-defendant fraud trial at Southwark Crown Court last month (R v Crawley). The case has since been ordered to continue.

Junior counsel in criminal cases often earn less than £28,000—sometimes as low as £14,000—once costs such as chambers rent are deducted.

According to LDF, a 19% rise in new entrants to the profession—by an extra 2,000 to 13,000 in the two years leading up to 2011/2012—has contributed to a decrease in workload. A combination of fixed fees for immigration, asylum and other areas of legally aided work, and the removal of legal aid completely from large swathes of civil work, has added to barristers’ woes.

Peter Alderson, LDF managing director, says: “As well as the cuts to legal aid meaning there is less work available for barristers, the Legal Aid Board is notoriously slow to pay them for their work, a big problem for barristers relying on quick payment to cover their bills. Late paying clients are also proving a real problem for barristers, which means a barrister’s cash-flow can hit extreme peaks and troughs throughout the year—if a tax bill hits during a trough, many barristers could find their backs against a wall.”

 

Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll