header-logo header-logo

Income drop for barristers

25 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Average takings drop 12% as profession feels pain of cuts

Barristers’ average income has fallen 12% in the last two years—from £123,000 to £108,000.

The figures, gathered by finance provider LDF, mean many may struggle to meet their 31 July bill deadline. The July bill is a payment on account for self-employed persons, usually equal to half of the previous year’s tax bill.

The average income may seem very generous indeed to many barristers. Junior criminal counsel, in particular, have been hard hit by cuts to legal aid fees. A 30% reduction in fees for Very High Cost Cases has led to a boycott by criminal barristers, which resulted in the high-profile stay of a multi-defendant fraud trial at Southwark Crown Court last month (R v Crawley). The case has since been ordered to continue.

Junior counsel in criminal cases often earn less than £28,000—sometimes as low as £14,000—once costs such as chambers rent are deducted.

According to LDF, a 19% rise in new entrants to the profession—by an extra 2,000 to 13,000 in the two years leading up to 2011/2012—has contributed to a decrease in workload. A combination of fixed fees for immigration, asylum and other areas of legally aided work, and the removal of legal aid completely from large swathes of civil work, has added to barristers’ woes.

Peter Alderson, LDF managing director, says: “As well as the cuts to legal aid meaning there is less work available for barristers, the Legal Aid Board is notoriously slow to pay them for their work, a big problem for barristers relying on quick payment to cover their bills. Late paying clients are also proving a real problem for barristers, which means a barrister’s cash-flow can hit extreme peaks and troughs throughout the year—if a tax bill hits during a trough, many barristers could find their backs against a wall.”

 

Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll