header-logo header-logo

Impeachment matters

22 September 2017 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 6672 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Athelstane Aamodt provides a master class in impeachment at home & abroad

Daniel Kammen, the US State Department’s Science Envoy, sent a letter of resignation to President Donald Trump last month. The first letter at the beginning of each paragraph of his letter spelt out the acrostic ‘IMPEACH’. There have been various calls from President Trump’s opponents for him to be impeached.

What is impeachment? How often has it been used? And does the same thing exist here in the UK?

The impeachment of a US President is governed, as you would expect, by the United States Constitution. The House of Representatives has the exclusive power to decide whether to impeach or not (‘impeachment’ is technically the process whereby the House formally charges someone with an offence). If the House votes by a simple majority on a resolution to impeach on a charge then the Senate will hear the trial which is presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (famously, during Bill Clinton’s impeachment hearing in 1999, the then Chief Justice William Rehnquist

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll