header-logo header-logo

Immigration Rules overhaul

22 January 2019
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

The Law Commission has proposed a major refit of the UK’s Immigration Rules, which it says are complicated and difficult to follow.

The overhaul would not affect any substantive policy but would focus on how the Rules are drafted and presented: for example, removing unnecessary repetition, providing a less confusing structure and using clearer language. It asks for views, in a consultation launched this week, on making the Rules less prescriptive by creating shorter, more general Rules supported by guidance that is illustrative only in order to give more discretion to caseworkers.

Since 1973, the Rules have grown from 40 pages to about 1,100 pages. Their complexity, the Commission says, adversely affects not only applicants themselves but also Home Office caseworkers who must put them into practice.

Law Commissioner for Public Law, Nicholas Paines QC, said: ‘As the Immigration Rules have become longer, more detailed and more specific, they’ve also become more complicated and harder to follow for applicants.

‘The Home Office has asked us to help put things right. Our proposals would introduce clearer language, and improve the presentation of the Rules so they’re easier to understand and follow.’

According to the Law Commission, one problem is that the Home Office has pursued a policy of making the Rules more prescriptive and therefore more transparent in recent years. Unfortunately, however, this has made the Rules longer, more complicated and harder to follow. Consequently, applicants may find it necessary to seek expensive legal advice in order to navigate the system.

Its proposals include taking a uniform, standardised approach to the wording, headings, definitions and section numbering; removing overlapping provisions; and investigating whether adding hyperlinks, signposting and interactive tools could help applicants.

The consultation, Simplifying the Immigration Rules, closes on 26 April.

Issue: 7825 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll