header-logo header-logo

Immigration

07 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Kajuga) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 426 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 273 (Feb)

It was a matter of common sense that if a person obstructed the deportation process and fails to cooperate with the secretary of state then the “reasonable” period would be longer and probably much longer. While it might not be indefinite, it could certainly extend to a period covering, if necessary, a number of years, provided the secretary of state made real and continuous efforts to ascertain where the detainee had come from and should be deported to. The period would continue to be reasonable until those efforts were finally exhausted. If that were not the case then those liable to deportation could frustrate the process and work it to their own advantage by failing to co-operate with the authorities. Their release back into the community could generate fresh claims, prolonging the deportation process and using up further resource.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll