header-logo header-logo

IMMIGRATION

30 March 2007
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] UKHL 11, [2007] All ER (D) 338 (Mar)

The House of Lords had to consider the decision-making role of appellate immigration authorities when deciding appeals, on Convention grounds, against refusal of leave to enter or remain.

HELD The first task of the appellate immigration authority is to establish the relevant facts, which may have changed since the original decision was made. The authority should test the evidence, assess the sincerity of the applicant’s evidence and the genuineness of his concerns, and evaluate the nature and strength of the family bond in the particular case.

The authority must consider and weigh all that tells in favour of the refusal of leave which is challenged, with particular reference to justification under Art 8(2) of the Convention, eg the general administrative desirability of applying known rules so that the system of immigration control is workable, predictable, consistent and fair between applicants; the damage to good administration and effective control if a system is perceived by applicants internationally to be unduly porous,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll